NUJ PR & Communications branch
c/o NUJ HQ 72 Acton Street, London, WC1X 9NB.
PR & Communications Branch Organiser:
Fiona Swarbrick 0207 843 3729
Mark Whitehead 07906720141
Charles Harkness & Barry White
Branch Web Managers:
Mick Holder & Barry White
Branch Equality Officer:
Sector NEC member:
Please help build our branch database by sending your email address to: email@example.com
Branch meetings from May 2018
New Venue NUJ HQ Headland House, 72 Acton Street, London, WC1 9 NB. The building is fully accessible. The nearest tube/station is King's Cross/St Pancras International.
Meetings 2018: Wednesdays 6.30pm 10 January (AGM). 14 February (Conference business). No meeting in March. 11 April (including pre- Delegate Meeting matters) and 9 May (including report back from the Delegate Meeting). Please note we are now meeting at NUJ HQ, Headland House.
From the NEC up
Barry White London NEC region Thu, 11 Feb, 2010
Itís Policy time
Last Thursdayís meeting of the policy committee (PC) was the first for the new NEC. The agenda was lengthy because the remit of the committee is very wide ranging - from parliamentary and TUC matters to international Ė the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ).
Our first job was to elect a chair and this we did Ė Jim Boumelha (who is currently the president of the IFJ) being our unanimous choice.
We then moved onto a review of motions passed at last yearís conference held in Southport. Motions that are relevant to the work of the committee were considered and an update given on progress. While most fall to our officials to progress, a few were referred to PC members to get on with. For instance a motion on Identification in court of adult defendants originally moved by the Netherlands branch told us to liaise with European journalists unions Ė so thatís down to me as the unionís nominee to the EFJ steering committee (a job currently held by John Barnsby). Itís only when you are confronted with having to actually do something about conference motions that you realise how much work is actually involved, which is why we spend some 2 hours discussing them Ė but thatís what we are there for!
On the report on TUC matters there was an interesting discussion on proposals to change the way annual congress is organised. TUC income is down, because affiliated unions membership is down so adjustments have to be made. In October the TUCís executive committee considered a draft consultation paper for affiliated unions to consider options for changing the arrangements for annual congress. Jeremy Dear explained that whilst there was no proposal to hold congress less frequently (unlike us) significant savings could be made by holding a smaller shorter (3 day) London based congress in alternate years (starting in 2011 Ė maybe). Each union would be entitled to a minimum of two delegates Ė which it is said would safeguard the position of smaller unions Ė although it was not clear just how many we would be entitled to at this stage (we elect three members of our delegation at our conference) In the end the proposal was supported Ė nobody voted against, but I think the abstentions were in the majority! The TUCís executive will consider the unionsí responses at their March meeting. No doubt some will see this model as a possible way forward of restoring our own annual delegate meetings, but that is yet to be seen!
Thatís enough from the PC for now, but Iíll write more next week on some other items of interest that came up.